‹ All documentation
Evidence reference
The Microsoft researchers argued that a single fixed dwell-time threshold assumes uniform reading time and can misclassify click-level satisfaction.
SupportedSUPPORTEDclm_019ff289-27f1-7a7d-94d0-165bdfbb8bee
This is a stable reference page for one canonical claim in the Editory evidence base. It exists for traceability and citations; the curated documentation is the readable entry point.
Cited by documentation
Sources
- Modeling Dwell Time to Predict Click-level Satisfaction (WSDM 2014)
Microsoft Research / ACM WSDM 2014 (Kim, Hassan Awadallah, White, Zitouni) · primary source · retrieved 2026-08-21
“having a single threshold value assumes that users need a fixed amount of time to be satisfied with any result click” — Abstract / Section 1
- Modeling Dwell Time to Predict Click-level Satisfaction - Microsoft Research publication page
Microsoft Research · primary source · retrieved 2026-08-21
“the amount of dwell time needed to predict whether any click is associated with satisfaction” — Publication abstract
- Explicit In Situ User Feedback for Web Search Results
Microsoft Research · primary source · retrieved 2026-08-21
“the dwell time threshold between negative and positive in situ feedback being 87 seconds, longer than the more common heuristic of 30 seconds” — lines 9-11
- Personalized Models of Search Satisfaction
Microsoft Research · primary source · retrieved 2026-08-21
“proposed models can predict search satisfaction more accurately than a global baseline that applies the same satisfaction model across all users” — lines 10-12
- A Term-Based Methodology for Query Reformulation Understanding
arXiv (independent authors citing Kim et al. 2014) · retrieved 2026-08-21
“argues that this single value cannot capture the complexities of reading behavior and user satisfaction” — Section 5.3 Dwell Time
Release: seo-geo-product-v0.3 · Phase Two freeze: P2-CORE300-FINAL-v1.0 · Generated: 2026-08-23T08:01:40Z